Blogger Widgets

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Rankings & What's Next: UFC Light Heavyweights

Rankings & What's Next: UFC Light Heavyweights

Every Wednesday for the past eight weeks, I've taken the rankings from UFC.com, Fight Matrix, Sherdog, and MMA Weekly, combined them, and used the combined rankings to determine who got the next title shot and who participated in the next #1 contender's match based on a set of rules (rules will be listed below). For the next eight weeks, I'm going to go back through all of the men's divisions (Sherdog and MMA Weekly have a pound-for-pound list for woman but not an explicit women's bantamweight list, so I'm skipping that division for now) taking a look at the fights that have occurred since my last post, how the rankings have changed, and then take a look ahead.

My previous post on the UFC Light Heavyweights can be found here.

Here's what happened in the division in the past eight weeks:

  • Jon Jones defeated Alexander Gustafsson at UFC 165 to retain the title.
  • Fabio Maldonado defeated Joey Beltran at UFC Fight Night 29.
  • Thiago Silva defeated Matt Hamill at UFC Fight Night 29.
  • Jimi Manuwa defeated Ryan Jimmo at UFC Fight Night 30.

The combined rankings for the division are now as such:

Combined Rankings

UFCFight MatrixSherdogMMA Weekly
Last Update:10/28/201311/03/201310/28/201310/27/2013
1.Jon Jones1(0)111
2.Alexander Gustafsson 2(1)422
3.Phil Davis 4(3)245
4.Rashad Evans 5(4)336
5.Glover Teixeira 3(2)763
6.Antonio Nogueira 6(5)574
7.Dan Henderson 7(6)857
8.Chael Sonnen 8(7)6108
9.Gegard Mousasi 9(8)9910
10.Mauricio Rua 10(9)109
Ryan Bader8

With most of the fighters in the top ten not active in the past eight weeks (which isn't surprising and is a sign that I probably should do this every eight weeks for each division), there's not a lot of changes in the light heavyweight top ten. Gustafsson moved up a spot after a very strong showing in his title fight loss to Jones. Machida has fallen out of the top ten with his move down to middleweight. Otherwise everything else is pretty much the same.

My rules for determining who gets the next title shot and who fights to be the next #1 contender:

  • The next title contender would be the highest ranked fighter that:
    • Won two fights in a row.
    • Won three fights since his last loss in a title fight or against the current champion unless he's a former champion that successfully defended the belt.
    • Won five fights in a row if his number of losses against the current champion is two greater than his number of wins.
  • The next #1 contender match would be between the next two highest ranked fighters that:
    • Won his last fight.
    • Won two fights since his last loss in a title fight or against the current champion unless he's a former champion that successfully defended the belt.
    • Won four fights in a row if his number of losses against the current champion is two greater than his number of wins.

Matches I'd Make

Starting off with the title shot, up next for Jon Jones would be Phil Davis. Mr. Wonderful has rattled off three wins since his loss to Evans in a title eliminator match and he's due to get his shot at the title. For the #1 contender's match, I'd set up Glover Teixeira to thrown down with Antonio Rogerio Nogueira. Only three other fighters in the top ten are coming off of wins: Rashad Evans, Chael Sonnen, and Gegard Mousasi. Since Evans and Sonnen are the higher ranked of the three, I'd match those two up. As for Mousasi, we'll have to look a bit deeper in the division. I think the best two options are Thiago Silva and Jimi Manuwa. With Silva missing weight in his last fight, I wouldn't want to reward him with Mousasi, so I'd pair up Manuwa and Mousasi instead. As for the fighters coming off of losses, I'd match up Alexander Gustafsson with Dan Henderson to get one of the two back into the title picture. Then I'd let Mauricio Rua take on Ryan Bader to see which one of the two deserves to be at the bottom of the top ten.

Matches the UFC has Made

Although not officially signed nor slated for an event, the UFC has stated that Teixeira gets the next crack at Jones. Gustafsson was set up to take on Nogueira in March with a title rematch for Alex on the line, but Little Nog has had to withdraw from the fight and has been replaced by Manuwa (who will be fighting in his home country). Rashad Evans and Chael Sonnen are set to lock horns at UFC 167 the weekend after next. Henderson is moving down to middleweight to take on Vitor Belfort in the main event of UFC Fight Night 32 this Saturday. Mousasi will also be dropping down to middleweight, and he will take on Lyoto Machida in the main event of a fight night in Brazil in February. Rua and Bader will both be fighting at UFC Fight Night 33 in Australia but not against each other. Shogun will be taking on James Te Huna while Bader will be taking on the aging Anthony Perosh. Both Te Huna and Perosh are from Australia.

Matches I'd Add to the UFC's

Only two fighters from the top ten are without opponents: Davis and Nogueira. Mr. Wonderful defeated Little Nog in early 2011, and with Nogueira out through at least March, there's no point in holding up Davis waiting for this match up. Rumors are that Phil will be the one to welcome Daniel Cormier to the light heavyweight division, and I can accept that match up although I'd expect a stinker of a fight.

A number of the top guys from the division are moving down to middleweight likely because the Anderson Silva era might be over and Chris Weidman seems beatable. With the close fight between Jones and Gustafsson, it'll be interesting to see if some of the contenders make their way back up thinking that Bones' weakness may have been exposed. With DC coming down (and Dos Santos ought to be trying to figure out if there's any way he could make 205) and a Gus rematch on the horizon, 2014 should be an interesting year for the division.

Posted by at 12:30 PM 0 comments
Labels:

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

2013 NFL Playoff Possibilities: Week 9

The following percentages were calculated by "playing out" the remaining games of the season via coinflip with one caveat: for each set of simulations, one team is picked to win out while another is picked to lose out. Each combo is used an equal number of times. Using the "win out"/"lose out" teams gives information on which teams are starting to have their playoff chances fade away (i.e. those teams that don't always make the playoffs when they win out) and which teams are locking up a spot (i.e. those teams that make the playoffs even if they lose out).

AFC East
DivisionPlayoffsDivision ΔPlayoffs Δ
Buffalo Bills3.1%5.8%-4.2%-5.7%
Miami Dolphins10.7%24.5%+0.0%+5.6%
New England Patriots70.5%83.0%+4.7%+6.8%
New York Jets15.7%32.0%-0.5%+5.5%

New England, New York, and Miami won this weekend, but only the Patriots saw their odds of winning the division increase. The Dolphins didn't lose any ground unlike the Jets because their win came against a conference foe. The Bills are pretty much done.

AFC North
DivisionPlayoffsDivision ΔPlayoffs Δ
Baltimore Ravens12.0%15.1%-4.3%-7.6%
Cincinnati Bengals62.9%70.2%-3.4%-6.1%
Cleveland Browns18.6%23.6%+8.8%+9.2%
Pittsburgh Steelers6.6%7.7%-1.0%-3.0%

The Browns were the only winners from the division this past weekend, but they only got a slight boost from the win.

AFC South
DivisionPlayoffsDivision ΔPlayoffs Δ
Houston Texans4.6%7.2%-7.8%-7.8%
Indianapolis Colts73.7%79.9%+6.7%+8.1%
Jacksonville Jaguars0.7%0.9%-0.5%-0.5%
Tennessee Titans21.0%32.5%+1.6%+6.1%

Funny to think that had Houston not gotten "lucky" in their first two games, that the AFC South could have two 0-8 teams. Indianapolis has a pretty strong hold on the division, but Tennessee is still alive.

AFC West
DivisionPlayoffsDivision ΔPlayoffs Δ
Denver Broncos30.3%83.8%-3.1%+0.3%
Kansas City Chiefs65.1%96.9%+7.8%+3.9%
Oakland Raiders0.6%12.0%-1.6%-5.9%
San Diego Chargers3.9%24.8%-3.1%-8.9%

The Chiefs are closing in on locking up the first playoff position. The two games between Kansas City and Denver between weeks 11 and 13 will decide the fate of the division, but all of the teams in the division are still alive in the playoff hunt.

NFC East
DivisionPlayoffsDivision ΔPlayoffs Δ
Dallas Cowboys57.6%62.9%+2.8%+4.8%
New York Giants7.4%8.8%-2.8%-2.5%
Philadelphia Eagles20.9%28.0%+0.3%+3.3%
Washington Redskins14.2%16.7%-0.3%+0.8%

Dallas had to fight to comeback against lowly Minnesota, but the win helped solidify their lead in the division. New York has the best chance of any of the last place teams to win their division.

NFC North
DivisionPlayoffsDivision ΔPlayoffs Δ
Chicago Bears32.9%47.4%+11.0%+12.3%
Detroit Lions33.6%50.5%+3.8%-0.6%
Green Bay Packers33.2%48.0%-13.7%-14.2%
Minnesota Vikings0.4%1.5%-1.1%-2.5%

The three-way tie between the Bears, Lions, and Packers can be seen in each of their division winning chances. Detroit has a slight edge due to having the best conference record, and likewise Green Bay has an edge over Chicago for the same reason even though the Bears won the first match up between the two.

NFC South
DivisionPlayoffsDivision ΔPlayoffs Δ
Atlanta Falcons2.6%6.3%-2.8%-5.2%
Carolina Panthers35.4%56.2%+11.7%+12.7%
New Orleans Saints61.9%78.5%-8.5%-5.8%
Tampa Bay Buccaneers0.1%0.2%-0.4%-2.3%

Things are getting tighter in the South, as Carolina closes in on New Orleans. Tampa Bay has the worst playoff chances of any team in the NFL.

NFC West
DivisionPlayoffsDivision ΔPlayoffs Δ
Arizona Cardinals3.4%24.0%-1.2%-0.8%
San Francisco 49ers23.6%72.0%-4.9%-0.5%
Seattle Seahawks72.3%92.9%+7.8%+4.5%
St. Louis Rams0.8%6.0%-1.7%-4.0%

The Seahawks have the second best shot of winning their division and the second best chance of making the playoffs of all teams in the NFL. The 49ers have a better chance of making the playoffs than a few of the divisional leaders.

19 teams might not win their division even if they win out. Of those teams, 10 might not even make the playoffs.

Div WinPlayoffs
Tampa Bay Buccaneers1.8%6.8%
Minnesota Vikings11.0%40.3%
St. Louis Rams15.9%95.4%
Oakland Raiders16.0%99.8%
Jacksonville Jaguars17.3%22.9%
Buffalo Bills50.7%91.6%
Atlanta Falcons53.5%99.2%
Arizona Cardinals58.2%100.0%
Houston Texans71.9%99.3%
San Diego Chargers77.8%100.0%
Pittsburgh Steelers87.9%98.8%
New York Jets88.7%100.0%
New York Giants89.7%99.5%
Miami Dolphins94.6%100.0%
Cleveland Browns98.1%100.0%
Philadelphia Eagles98.2%100.0%
Washington Redskins98.3%100.0%
Baltimore Ravens98.9%100.0%
San Francisco 49ers99.8%100.0%

Three teams have started the process of locking up a playoff position (they would still make the playoffs even if they lose out). The Chiefs lead that group already having better than a one third chance of making the playoffs if they lost their remaining seven games.

Div WinPlayoffs
Kansas City Chiefs0.0%36.4%
Seattle Seahawks0.8%2.2%
New England Patriots0.3%0.3%

Posted by at 11:00 PM 0 comments
Labels:

Monday, November 4, 2013

NFL 2013 Playoff Picture: Week 9

The following is calculated assuming that all unplayed games are 0-0 ties. That is assumed to make tiebreakers work out better.

Every team in the NFL has now played at least eight games (ten teams have played nine including the undefeated Chiefs), and the race for the playoffs is now truly heating up. This weeks playoff picture features one returning team and one team that's making its first appearance of the year.

Starting things off in the AFC, New England continues to lead the East by two games over New York. Miami follows a half game behind the Jets, and Buffalo is a game and a half between the Dolphins. The Patriots and Jets are off this coming week, so New England will still have a two game lead when week 10 is done.

The Bengals continue to lead the North, but their lead is down to just two games over the Browns (the only team from the division to win this past weekend). The Ravens trail Cleveland by a half game, and the Steelers are a game behind Baltimore.

Down South, each spot is separated by two games. Indianapolis is on top, followed by Tennessee, then there's Houston, and finally Jacksonville brings up the rear.

As for the West, the Chiefs lead the Broncos by a game and a half. The Chargers are three games behind Denver, and the Raiders are a game behind San Diego.

Moving onto ranking the division leaders, everything is decided by record. Kansas City at 9-0 leads the way followed by New England at 7-2. Indianapolis (the only AFC division leader who's had their bye) is #3 at 6-2. Cincinnati has the #4 spot at 6-3.

Denver, with the second best record in the AFC, controls the first wild card position. The second spot goes to New York - the only other AFC team with a winning record. The AFC's playoff picture currently looks as such:

Over on the NFC side, it was a good week for the NFC East as each team that played won (the Giants had the week off). The Cowboys continue to lead the division and maintain a game lead over the Eagles. Philly has a half game lead over the Redskins, who in turn lead the Giants by a game.

Up North, there's a three way tie for best record between Chicago, Detroit, and Green Bay. The Packers beat the Lions who beat the Bears who beat the Packers, so the head-to-head tiebreaker doesn't solve anything. All three have defeated Minnesota once and are 2-1 in the division, so that doesn't solve things either. Moving onto common games, they're all 4-1 (with 5 more common games yet to be played), so that doesn't do it either. Chicago is 3-3 against NFC teams, Detroit is 4-2, while Green Bay is 3-2, so the Lions have the best conference record and currently have the tiebreaker edge. The Bears have the head-to-head edge over the Packers, so they are second for now. Green Bay is third, and the Vikings are fourth four games back.

New Orleans still leads the South, but their lead is now down to a game over Carolina. Atlanta is three behind the Panthers, and the 0-8 Buccaneers are two games behind the Falcons.

Out West, the Seahawks lead the 49ers by a game and a half. The Cardinals are two games behind San Francisco, and the Rams are a game and a half behind Arizona.

Seattle has the best record in the NFC and currently control the #1 seed. New Orleans are a game and a half behind in the #2 seed. Detroit is next one game back of the Saints, and Dallas is a half game behind the Lions.

Looking at the second place teams for the wild card, San Francisco has the best record and thus the first wild card position. Carolina and Chicago are tied for the next spot. Since they haven't played, conference record will decide who gets the spot. The Panthers are 5-2 in the NFC while the Bears are only 3-3, so currently Carolina has the second wild card spot. Here's the NFC's current playoff picture:

Looking ahead to next week, the only divisional lead that could change hands is that of the NFC North. Interestingly, the Bears have the best chance to lead the division. Chicago is playing Detroit, and if the Bears win, they take over the lead regardless of the outcome of the Packers game (since Chicago currently has the head-to-head tiebreaker). If the Lions beat the Bears, the lead will go to the Packers if they win (since they currently have the head-to-head tiebreaker over Detroit) otherwise the Lions will maintain control.

As for the wild cards, the only team locked in is the Broncos. The second AFC wild card will go to the Titans if they win (and they should since they're playing the Jaguars). Otherwise, it'll go to the Chargers if they win. If neither Tennessee nor San Diego win, the spot will stay with the Jets (who'll be on a bye).

On the NFC side, the winner of Carolina at San Francisco will have the first wild card spot. The second spot will be determined by the outcome of the Detroit/Chicago and Philadelphia/Green Bay games. If the Eagles beat the Packers, the loser of Carolina/San Francisco will get the second spot. Otherwise, if the Packers win, the Lions take the spot if they win. If Detroit loses, Green Bay gets the spot if the 49ers win, but the 49ers get it if they lose (since San Francisco has the head-to-head tiebreaker over Green Bay).

Posted by at 11:15 PM 0 comments
Labels:

Sunday, November 3, 2013

My Where's George Week in Review: 10/27/13 - 11/02/13

My Where's George Week in Review: 10/27/13 - 11/02/13

At the start of last year, I began publishing a weekly review of my past seven days of activity in regards to Where's George. These reviews were largely focused around key goals/predictions for the year (including bills entered, bills hit, and total hits). Some of the things I tracked, in retrospect, weren't really all that interesting, and a lot of the tracking around bill entries wasn't all that useful. When one really thinks about it, Where's George is all about the hits. As such, I've revamped my weekly reviews to be focused on what was interesting about my hits in the past week, and using that data, scoring the week on a scale of 0 to 10. I'm sure as time goes on that I'll tinker with the scoring system, but I think what I have for now is good for the 1.0 version.

With that said, on a scale of 0 to 10 this past week was a:

6.7

In the past week, I got 36 hits in 4 States [AZ, CA32, LA, WA] as well as an international hit in Colmar, France. Of those hits, 4 were the 2nd hit on the bill and the rest (32) were the initial hit on the bill. Below is a calendar view of the hits throughout the week:

SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday
27282930310102
4564836

I came into the week with a 6 day hit streak. I got a hit on every day of this week which extended the streak to 13 days.

I didn't get any hits in previously unhit counties in the past week leaving my total of counties hit at 566.

Of the States hit in the past week, 1 was in a "Sleepy" State (a "Sleepy" State is a State in which I haven't received a hit in over twelve weeks) (last hit date in parenthesis): Louisiana (06/18/2013). 21 States meet the "Sleepy" status for next week: Alaska (03/02/2010), Delaware (07/14/2011), Kentucky (10/14/2011), Rhode Island (03/04/2012), District of Columbia (09/26/2012), Tennessee (01/17/2013), Wyoming (01/17/2013), South Carolina (03/21/2013), Connecticut (03/30/2013), Nebraska (04/30/2013), Oklahoma (05/05/2013), North Dakota (05/05/2013), Maine (05/25/2013), West Virginia (05/26/2013), New Hampshire (06/22/2013), Alabama (07/08/2013), Iowa (07/15/2013), Arkansas (07/16/2013), Minnesota (08/04/2013), Utah (08/07/2013), Colorado (08/08/2013).

Of the bills hit in the past week, 10 were active for more than a year. Of those, the longest active bill from the bunch was re-entered 2 Years 193 Days 17 Hours 32 Minutes after I originally entered it. That bill is now 194th on my all-time longest active list.

And now, the speed round of data on everything else. 3 of the hits I received in the past week were from Georgers with Profiles: D9337---1C, A3871---8B, IB508---19B. Additionally 31 of the hits contained notes. 1 of the hits were on non-Georges: $5. The hits were on bills that spread across 9 of the 12 FRBs. The FRBs for which I didn't receive hits were Philadelphia (C), Minneapolis (I), and Dallas (K). I got hits on four new combos: 2001-$1-HC, 2003A-$1-E*, 2009-$1-DE, and 2009-$1-J*.

So how did this week end up as a 6.7? To start off the calculation, I compare this week's number with the lowest and highest from the past 12 weeks and score it based on how it fits in that range - so if this week's number is midway between the low and the high, it scores a 0.5 for that category (i.e. if this week's States Hit was 10, the past 12 weeks' low was 5, and the past 12 weeks' high was 15, that'd be a 0.5). A category can be scored at a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 1.25 meaning that if this week is better than any of the past 12, bonus points are awarded. Some categories are worth more than others (in the 1.0 version, categories are worth either 1 or 2). The sum of the products of the category scores and value results in the overall score for the week. That number is then compared to the overall scores for the previous 12 weeks, and where it ends up in the range results in the week's score on a scale from 0 to 10 (so if the overall score is midway between the two, the week is a 5.0). A week cannot score below 0 or above 10.

Here's a tabular view of this week's scores:

Past 12 Weeks
StatWeekMinMaxScoreWeightS*W
Hits that Changed States65120.142.00.29
Days with Hits7671.002.02.00
Distinct States Hit54100.172.00.33
Hits Beyond the 1st on a Bill 143150.082.00.17
Bills Active Over a Year 216.714.253.40.062.00.13
New Counties0140.002.00.00
Hits from Georgers with Profiles3050.602.01.20
Hits with Notes3119340.802.01.60
International Hits1011.001.01.00
Hits on Non-Georges1040.251.00.25
Hits in "Sleepy" States1020.501.00.50
Distinct FRBs Hit97110.501.00.50
New Series/Denom/FRB/Block Combo Hit4060.671.00.67
*** TOTAL ***8.63
1 - The second hit on a bill is worth 1 point. Each hit thereafter doubles in value (i.e. The third is worth 2 and the fourth is worth 4.).
2 - A bill active for a year is worth 1 point. Each additional year doubles in value and partial years add partial value.

The minimum overall score over the past 12 weeks was 4.93 and the maximum was 10.49 so this week's score of 8.63 resulted in a scale score of 6.7.

This week had the best scale score since I've started measuring weeks using my new formula, but that was largely due to better weeks falling off of the measurement. Oddly, this week did feel like it was a pretty good week, so I wonder if that's because it was or because the past 12 weeks have been poor in comparison? Nothing from this week set a new high for any of the categories, so next week should also be rated against a simpler scale.

Posted by at 1:00 PM 0 comments
Labels:

Friday, November 1, 2013

My October 2013 Where's George Summary

My October 2013 Where's George Summary

In October, I entered 560 bills and received 133 hits (109 of which were the initial hit on the bill). I ended the month with a hit rate of 16.26% [+0.06% compared to end of September] and a slugging percentage of 19.21% [+0.09%].

Top Ten Months by Hits

1.May 2012
160
2.Apr 2013
155
3.Jul 2013
154
4.Aug 2013
146
5.Apr 2012
139
6.Jul 2012
137
Jan 2013
137
8.Sep 2012
136
9.Oct 2013
133
10.Mar 2013
132

Top Ten Months by Entries

1.May 2013
1228
2.Sep 2013
996
3.Jun 2013
753
4.May 2012
730
5.Sep 2012
711
6.Sep 2011
675
7.Jun 2012
651
8.Oct 2011
641
9.May 2011
607
10.Apr 2010
604
:
13.Oct 2013
560

Not a lot of activity in the top ten entry lists this month because the majority of the bills I entered were in an effort to improve my series one dollar bingos (the effects of which will be noted below). 2009-$1-LK continues to move up on the hits list (this is expected to continue as it's my block with the most entries).

Blocks by Entries

1.2009-$1-LK+7621
2.2009-$1-LG+5569
3.2006-$1-LR560
4.2006-$1-LL554
5.2006-$1-LH512
6.2006-$1-LG490
7.2009-$1-LF+1478
8.2009-$1-LB+3461
9.2006-$1-LN395
10.2006-$1-LE381

2009 by Entries

1.2009-$1-LK+7621
2.2009-$1-LG+5569
3.2009-$1-LF+1478
4.2009-$1-LB+3461
5.2009-$1-LJ+3327
6.2009-$1-IA+1319
7.2009-$1-HA308
8.2009-$1-LI286
9.2009-$1-FC+1277
10.2009-$1-LE+1248

Blocks by Hits

1.2006-$1-LR+1137
2.2006-$1-LH123
3.2006-$1-LL121
4.2009-$1-LG+5112
5.2006-$1-LG106
6.2009-$1-LB+4102
7.2009-$1-LK+695
8.2006-$1-LN+194
9.2009-$1-LF+388
10.2006-$1-LE81
2006-$1-LJ81

Washington passed Hawaii for fourth on my hits by State list. Texas should pass by Hawaii in November. Of my top ten States, only Arizona didn't receive a hit in October. There was a little bit of activity in the county and city lists. Of note, Washoe NV moved up a spot to ninth (but at 46 hits behind #8, it's unlikely to get any higher).

States

1.CA+974162
2.NV+8206
3.OR+2107
4.WA+4101
5.HI+199
6.TX+298
7.AZ84
8.NY+370
9.IL+160
10.FL+150

Counties

1.Sacramento CA+251246
2.El Dorado CA+2254
3.Placer CA+12236
4.Alameda CA+8227
5.Santa Clara CA+4222
6.Los Angeles CA205
7.San Francisco CA+4153
Contra Costa CA+6153
9.Washoe NV+5107
10.San Joaquin CA+2106

Cities

1.Sacramento, CA+7460
2.Folsom, CA+8283
3.San Francisco, CA+4153
4.Rancho Cordova, CA+3112
5.El Dorado Hills, CA+1101
6.Roseville, CA+495
7.San Jose, CA+294
8.Elk Grove, CA79
9.Reno, NV+378
10.Citrus Heights, CA+272

I entered four new 2009 $1 blocks in October along with a new 2003 and three 2001 blocks. I got my first hit on six 2009 blocks, one 2006 block, and two 2001 blocks.

Series 2009 $1 Bingo

A BostonABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
B New YorkABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
C PhiladelphiaABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
D ClevelandABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
E RichmondABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
F AtlantaABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
G ChicagoABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
H St. LouisABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
I MinneapolisABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
J Kansas CityABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
K DallasABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
L San FranciscoABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
Progress: Hits 66/88 [75.0%]; Entries 81/88 [92.0%]
New First Entries: GH [10-09-2013]; BI [10-12-2013]; EG [10-17-2013]; J* [10-20-2013];
New First Hits: BH [10-07-2013]; EC [10-08-2013]; FG [10-12-2013]; DD [10-23-2013];
DE [10-28-2013]; J* [10-28-2013];

Series 2006 $1 Bingo

A BostonABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
B New YorkABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
C PhiladelphiaABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
D ClevelandABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
E RichmondABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
F AtlantaABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
G ChicagoABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
H St. LouisABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
I MinneapolisABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
J Kansas CityABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
K DallasABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
L San FranciscoABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
Progress: Hits 109/112 [97.3%]; Entries 112/112 [100.0%]
New First Entries: None
New First Hits: IC [10-23-2013];

Series 2003A $1 Bingo

A BostonABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
B New YorkABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
C PhiladelphiaABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
D ClevelandABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
E RichmondABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
F AtlantaABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
G ChicagoABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
H St. LouisABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
I MinneapolisABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
J Kansas CityABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
K DallasABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
L San FranciscoABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
Progress: Hits 84/93 [90.3%]; Entries 93/93 [100.0%]
New First Entries: None
New First Hits: None

Series 2003 $1 Bingo

A BostonABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
B New YorkABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
C PhiladelphiaABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
D ClevelandABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
E RichmondABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
F AtlantaABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
G ChicagoABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
H St. LouisABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
I MinneapolisABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
J Kansas CityABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
K DallasABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
L San FranciscoABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
Progress: Hits 58/87 [66.7%]; Entries 84/87 [96.6%]
New First Entries: B* [10-09-2013];
New First Hits: None

Series 2001 $1 Bingo

A BostonABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
B New YorkABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
C PhiladelphiaABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
D ClevelandABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
E RichmondABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
F AtlantaABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
G ChicagoABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
H St. LouisABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
I MinneapolisABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
J Kansas CityABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
K DallasABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
L San FranciscoABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVWXY*
Progress: Hits 33/63 [52.4%]; Entries 61/63 [96.8%]
New First Entries: G* [10-09-2013]; C* [10-16-2013]; KD [10-27-2013];
New First Hits: CF [10-11-2013]; HC [10-30-2013];

Posted by at 12:00 PM 0 comments
Labels:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)